Boutique offensive security  ·  Fully remote

Penetration testing that finds what scanners cannot.

Manual security testing for web applications, APIs, and AI/LLM features — delivered by certified practitioners, mapped to recognised standards, and backed by a verification retest on every engagement.

12findings identified in a recent SaaS engagement
2verification retest rounds included
100%manually validated — no raw scanner output
Certified across offensive & cloud security
OSCPOSWPOSEP OSWEOSEDCRTP AWS Security – SpecialtyGCP Cloud Security EngineerAzure AZ-500

Engagement snapshot

A critical access-control flaw that automated scanning missed.

On a recent SaaS engagement — a platform integrating with a major e-commerce advertising API — manual testing surfaced a privilege-escalation chain allowing full account takeover through role and token manipulation. Automated scanning had not flagged it, because exploiting it required understanding the application's business logic rather than matching a signature.

Eleven further findings were documented across session handling, input validation, and cloud storage configuration. Each was retested after remediation.

12Findings documented
2Retest rounds
100%Critical & high resolved

Findings by severity

Critical
1
High
1
Medium
4
Low
6

Client identity and product details withheld under engagement confidentiality.

Services

Security testing built around how applications actually get breached.

We lead with manual penetration testing because business-logic flaws — the ones that cause real breaches — are invisible to automated tooling.

Emerging risk

AI / LLM Application Security

Adversarial testing of chatbots, RAG pipelines, and agents — prompt injection, insecure output handling, excessive agency, and training or context data leakage.

Explore this service →

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications

Infrastructure

Cloud & AI Infrastructure Security

Configuration review across AWS, GCP, and Azure — IAM and privilege boundaries, storage exposure, secret handling, and the model endpoints behind AI features.

Explore this service →

CIS Benchmarks · Provider best practice

Broad coverage

Vulnerability Assessment

Breadth-first identification and prioritisation across your estate, with every result manually triaged so you receive real issues rather than scanner noise.

Explore this service →

CVSS v3.1 · Manual triage

Why it matters

What separates a real penetration test from a scan report.

Tested by hand

Every engagement is executed by a certified practitioner. Tooling assists discovery; it never substitutes for exploitation and validation.

Scored and mapped

Findings carry CVSS v3.1 vectors and map to OWASP and STRIDE categories — so severity is defensible to your board and your customers.

Verified, not assumed

Remediation is re-tested and each finding is formally marked fixed, partially fixed, or outstanding. You get evidence, not an assumption.

Application and cloud

Offensive and cloud certifications in the same team means the application layer and the infrastructure under it are assessed together.

How we work

A defined engagement, start to verified finish.

Scoping

We agree targets, user roles, testing windows, and rules of engagement in writing before any testing begins — including what is explicitly out of scope.

Testing

Manual assessment across authenticated roles and trust boundaries, with critical findings reported as they are confirmed rather than held to the end.

Reporting

A full report with an executive summary, per-finding reproduction steps, severity scoring, and specific remediation guidance your engineers can act on.

Retest

After your fixes are deployed, we re-test each finding and issue an updated report recording verified remediation status.

Read the full methodology →

Find out what an attacker would find first.

Tell us what you have built and we will come back with scoping questions, a proposed approach, and a timeline.